A program is performed at one of these, and the price you are quoted is that centre's own published figure. All four publish a list anyone can read, which is why every number on these pages can be checked against the centre's page rather than against this one.
Korean law requires non-covered prices to be disclosed, which is why all four can be checked against the centre's own page rather than against this one. Read dates differ and each centre's page states its own.
| Centre | Published programs | ≈ USD, low to high | What sets it apart |
|---|---|---|---|
| KMI (한국의학연구소) | 4 | $411–1,130 | The only one of the four with a published MRI-inclusive tier, and the only one publishing focused single-system programs separately from its ladder. |
| Hanaro Medical Foundation (하나로의료재단) | 3 | $171–788 | The only one of the four that publishes how long each program takes, which is the figure that decides what else fits in the day. |
| Hanshin Medipia (한신메디피아) | 4 | $171–753 | The most granular published ladder of the four, at four rungs with the smallest steps between them. |
| MediOne (메디원) | 10 | $342–1,849 | The only one of the four that publishes its prices in English as well as Korean, at the same figures in both, and the only one with a published programme that includes predictive genetic testing. |
Every figure on this page carries its source and the date it was measured. See the methodology line under the comparison table.
Each centre's own published non-covered (비급여) price list, disclosure of which is required by 의료법 제45조. KMI, Hanaro Medical Foundation and Hanshin Medipia were read 2026-07-28; MediOne was read 2026-07-31, from both its Korean and its English site, which publish the same ten programmes at identical figures. Each centre's own read date is shown on its page. USD is converted at the rate on the pricing page and is approximate; the amount actually charged is quoted in your currency at booking. This citation covers the published prices and programme contents. It does not cover the partnership relationship, which is a fact about this venture rather than a figure, and it does not cover any foreigner-facing schedule at the other three centres, which none of them publishes (https://www.kmi.or.kr/HLCHK/PERSONAL; https://www.hanaromf.com/program/prog01/prog01_01.jsp; https://hsmedipia.co.kr/inspection/indivisual/class/all; https://en.medionemedicalcenter.com/packages), measured 2026-07-31.
Nobody from this site has toured these buildings and written it up, so these pages do not tell you which waiting room is nicer or whose staff were friendlier. What they carry is what each centre publishes about itself, read on a stated date, plus one thing per centre that is genuinely specific and checkable: which one publishes how long a program takes, which one publishes its prices in English at the same figures as in Korean, which one has the only genomics-inclusive program, and which one publishes no report turnaround at all.
That is a narrower page than a first-person centre review, and it is the kind this site can stand behind.